Maps of all or part of the village of Great Gidding
exist for the years 1851, 1866, 1871, 1887, 1901 and 1924. Studying
these, together with the Census returns made every 10 years from
1841 to 1901, and a few useful records of transfer of property,
it has been possible to piece together where the houses and cottages
were and for certain periods of time, who lived in them. For those
that were privately owned or were copyhold properties, there are
records of many of the changes of ownership and can go back into
the 18th century and for a few properties it is possible to make
reasonable guesses to tie up the ownership with the map of 1641.
To trace the occupiers is harder, except that it is probable that
before 1750 or so the owners lived there.
How accurately this has been possible, and with what
confidence, depends on the property in question. The main problem
arises from the variable number of families that seem to have been
squeezed into some tenements. Cottages appear to have been subdivided
and later recombined, and whole areas have, from time to time been
redeveloped.
As discussed in "the history" ( A Millennium History
of Great Gidding , published in March 2001) it is probable that
the village was initially centred on Chapel End. The new village,
probably built in the mid 1200s, was originally determined to support
the Open Field system of farming, which remained in operation until
the 1860s. Records show that from the time regular records are available
in about 1770, there were about 9 farms of 100 acres or more in
the parish — mostly owned by the Lord of the Manor and rented
to the farmers.
In general the farms were placed along the west side
of Main Street as there was direct access to the Open Fields from
the back of their closes via Backside Lane. The support businesses
were placed on the east side, with the single exception of Laurel
Farm, which had direct access to the Mill and the fields to the
East as there was no building along Mill Road until after Enclosure
in 1869. Chapel End had two farms - one eventually known as Mill
Farm and a smaller one based on what is now Thatch Cottage.
Many of the services for the farmers were situated
on the east side of Main Street, including two blacksmiths, a carpenter,
a harness-maker, a wheelwright, a grocer, a butcher, a baker, several
shoemakers, and a tailor. There were a few more on the west side
and in Chapel End.
To provide labour for these farms there were, in
the mid 1800s, five concentrations of cottages up the east side
of Main Street - in one case what amounted almost to a ghetto -
and a scattering of cottages in Chapel End. There were two at the
bottom of Main Street - on either side of the Manse. A small one
where the village Hall now stands, about 8 cottages where the Alexanders
now live (No 62) and "the ghetto" across Mill Road from the Fox
and Hounds. From 1851 and 1871 between 80 and 85 people lived here,
and it may have been this overcrowding that eventually caused the
Mill Road development.
In addition to working backwards in time from the
Census returns, I have always wanted to see if I could trace a house
(or at least a plot) through from the 1641 map to more recent times,
and learn who owned / occupied it. As most of the village was owned
by the Lord of the Manor, this limited the choice, as I do not have
rent books except for the more recent times.
There are a number of families who formed what I
have called in the History the Principal Families of the village.
These families often own or occupy more than one house, and they
will often form cross-threads between the houses and farms. It should
be remembered that Great Gidding was farmed under the open field
system until 1858, when enclosure occurred. The result was that
the owners of farms could, in principle, continue to live in one
farm-house and rent a variety of combinations of strips in the many
furlongs of the three open fields. In practise, people seem to have
moved farm-houses when they changed to larger farms. When they rented
more than one farm at the same time, they presumably sub-let the
less desirable farm-house to members of their families or to outsiders.
A number of properties were owned freehold - there
were six in 1641. For others the copyhold had been purchased (which
controlled the level of rent which could be charged) and this could
be sold or handed down to members of the family. There were about
12 of these copyhold properties shown on the 1641 map. For these
two categories of ownership, records were kept of the transfer of
title in the Manor Court records, and so with good fortune ownership
can be traced through time. These tended to be just a cottage with
a small croft of an acre or less, or a cottage plus a close of up
to 7 acres. It was probably usually the case that farmers who owned
cottages rented these out while they were renting larger farms,
or put in their relations, either as young families or when they
were past working age.
Most farms, and the associated farm-houses were owned
by the Lord of the Manor, and so the only way to follow the tenancy
is through the rent books. These exist back to 1827, when the Fitzwilliam
estate bought the village and before that I have had to rely on
Land Tax records and lists of levies to support the poor which were
demanded of all rent payers and property owners, as a direct proportion
of the rentable value. Other lists show how many sheep and cows
could be kept on the common lands in the village - and again these
were in direct proportion to the rentable value of the properties.
The approximate sizes of the various farms can therefore be estimated
and a reasonable deduction made of the transfer of farms. This is
possible back to 1780 reliably and on occasion a few decades further
back.
A terrier of 1724 lists 11 farms (to which must be
added Gidding Grove Farm), 8 half farms, 33 cottages and 11 small
cottages. Later land-tax records, rent lists and census returns
mention houses and cottages. For convenience I am not going to try
to identify the borderline between cottages and houses. If anyone
feels aggrieved that their current residence has been wrongly identified,
I apologise.
I started with Faulkners Cottage - No 55/57 Main
Street - (see page 12 of the History and also shown in the top picture
of page 14). In fact I started with the Manor Court records and
the one that looked most promising has turned out to be this cottage.
If I had chosen a cottage to research it would have been this one
- not only because it is one of the prettiest in the village, but
we now think it is about the oldest. It has been recently bought
and is being renovated - and has to retain its external features.
It is stripped out completely inside at present and one can clearly
see the timbers of an earlier cottage with much steeper roof-line.
I had intended to limit this to the one property, but one thing
leads to another !
I have now added links back to the 1641 map for
No 50, the plot, just above the village Hall and most recently Crown
Cottage. More are possible, but will need further visits to the
record offices, and may involve transcription from the Latin records.
It will not happen quickly.
OWNERSHIP
In about 1630 a family called Daniel arrived in
Gt Gidding and Thomas Daniel bought or inherited the copyhold
to the property (it was variously over the years described as
2 or 3 cottages/dwellings). I should explain that the copyhold
was not outright ownership of the property, but provided security
of tenure and the right to pass this on to one's heirs - provided
that the terms of the agreement, such as payment of rent and maintaining
certain features of the property, were fulfilled. In the case
of Faulkner's cottage the Lords of the Manor held the freehold
until after 1900, so when I talk about inheriting or selling it
is the copyhold which is involved.
Thomas Daniel's name is on the 1641 map (page 43,
find the site of Manor House in Parsonage close and the plot we
are talking about is three to the left of this up the hill) I
have seen the original map and I can assure you that it reads
"Tho Danell". When Thomas died, it passed, directly or indirectly
to James and his wife Sarah (Hodgskin). They had a daughter Ann,
and she inherited it in 1680. She held it until she died in 1738
by which time she was married to Edward Crawley (1667-1748). On
her death the property was passed to her son Edward, who himself
died in 1743 leaving it to his infant son Edward (1738 - ?).
In 1768 Edward Crawley sold it to James Cheney
(1746-1823) who had just arrived in the village from Woodford,
near Raunds, and it stayed in the Cheney family for 90 years.
On his death James passed it to his son, William (1772-1852) and
he, in turn passed it to his Grandchildren, William and Thomas
Cheney (sons of James Cheney who died in 1842 and appears to have
left Gidding before then).
In 1858 it was sold to Thomas Brawn, the third
son of John Brawn who arrived in the village in about 1810. Thomas
rented, and was living in, the house next door (No 59 - see picture
on page 12). In 1870 it went, via William Brawn (Thomas's brother
or nephew), to Robert Austin (wheelwright) who passed the copyhold
to his son Horace when he died in 1903. Horace Austin was listed
as the owner at the time of the 1910 Land Tax survey, so at some
time he bought the freehold from the Fitzwilliam Estate. In 1927
it was bought by James Faulkner (wheelwright) who had previously
lived in one of the two Mill Cottages, and who in 1960 passed
it to his son, Tom Faulkner (wheelwright) - who still owned the
cottage when he died in 2000.
DATING THE PRESENT BUILDING
Now that the cottage is being renovated, the steeper
roof-line of an older building can be seen in the roof space and
so an early single storey cottage was raised and refaced with
reddish brick. This was probably done some time around 1800.This
would fit well with the fact that the population seems to have
started going up from about 275 in 1750 reaching about 500 by
1820. We also know that the Fitzwilliam Estate bought the Lordship
of village in 1827 and started a programme of renovation of cottages
and other new building - as it did in other estates it owned.
The school was built in 1846.
It is possible that this brick came from the Great
Gidding brick-yard, but this is not easy to tell.
It has been said that the reddish brick came from
the brickyard at the clay-pit at the bottom of the village and
the more yellow clay from the pits just above the Chapel End pond.
However, this is not certain. The map of 1802 does not show any
buildings or pits in the field which became the brickyard; there
is nothing clear on the 1832 ordnance survey map; there was a
brick-maker renting the brickyard by 1839 and by 1851 there are
clearly several buildings in the brickyard. If Faulkner's cottage
is Great Gidding brick, then the re-facing might be later than
we thought - or perhaps reddish clay came from Chapel End before
the brickyard was started. It would be interesting to get a brick
expert to do some work on this subject.
OCCUPIERS
The Daniels
This is a much harder job to unravel - and rather
less continuous. Thomas Daniel appears, from the map, to have
lived there in 1641 and presumably up to his death in 1661. His
son James married Sarah Hodgkins in 1662 and must have lived in
the cottage. In 1671 James died and there are records of widow
Daniel receiving parish assistance from 1677 to '79 and then it
stops. This fits well with the property passing to the 13 year
old Ann in 1680 and perhaps she and her two sisters continued
to live there, if indeed they were still alive.
The Crawleys
Edward Crawley arrived in Great Gidding from Wooley
- a few miles to the south - in the early 1690s presumably looking
for somewhere to live, and found Ann in her mid 20s with a desirable
residence and he married her in about 1695. Edward and Ann must
have lived there until 1738, when Ann died. It is then possible
that their son, Edward junior moved in to look after Dad. Both
Edward junior and his wife, Mary died in 1743 whereupon their
5 year old son inherited. Edward senior died in 1748 and so who
looked after young Edward is not known, nor even if he stayed
in GG. Perhaps another of Edward senior's children was living
there. We know that the cottage(s) were rented to one Everett
Penn in the period up to their sale in 1768 to the Cheneys.
The Cheneys
James Cheney arrived in the village newly married
to Ann (maiden name unknown), and presumably moved into the cottage,
but straight away, in 1769, Ann died producing a daughter (who
survived). In 1770 or '71 James married again (another Ann - Richards)
and their four sons were born by 1776. The records are quite good
from 1780, and they show that by then, James Cheney owned the
cottage but at the same time rented a second property from the
Lord of the Manor, so it is not clear in which one he lived. For
interest, this second cottage was rebuilt in 1839 and I have been
able to trace that it was at 52/54 Main Street where Joseph Joyce
lived in 1851 - see the map on page 59 and pictures on pages 12
and 25 (picture 19). My guess is that James moved into the larger,
rented cottages before 1780 and rented out his own cottages. We
know that Jeffery Heighton (blacksmith and leading light in the
establishment of the Baptist Chapel in Gidding) lived there from
1783 to 1786. Samuel Cheney - (shoemaker and son of James) seems
to have spent his whole working life outside the village (perhaps
in Sawtry) but returned there by 1816 and lived in the cottage
just before he died at age 40 and his widow, Jane, was still there
in 1822. In 1831 a George Bird lived there.
I doubt if William Cheney (1772-1852), eldest son
of James senior, ever lived in the cottage, as by 1806 he was
established in a farm rented from the Lord of the Manor (with
cottage and close attached) of about 100 acres, and he was there
until about 1816, when it passed to Samuel Goodwin who married
Sarah Cheney - William's Aunt. Samuel Goodwin died in 1826 and
his son Josiah Goodwin took over until his death in 1841. This
needs more work, but their house/cottage was probably on the site
rented by Nathaniel Ditchins and shown on the 1851 map on page
59 of the History and was destroyed in the Great Fire of 1861.
There is no dwelling house on the site now, which is next to Warren
House.
James senior's second son, James Junior (1774-1845),
rented another farm, of about 120 acres from the Lord of the Manor
from 1803 to 1814. This farm was another victim of the 1861 fire
and was rebuilt as Laurel Farm, and for convenience the site will
be so called. James junior appears to have left the village by
1816 for Luddington. When he left Laurel farm it was taken over
by his elder brother William (see previous paragraph) until about
1827 when William also left the village, this time for Lutton,
where he took over Manor Farm until his death in 1852.
Returning to Faulkners cottages, from the 1820s
to the 1850s the property is described as "3 dwelling houses".
James Yardey, son in law to William (he married William's eldest
daughter) lived there from 1813 to at least 1822, even though
his first wife Ann Cheney died after only three years of marriage
at the age of 21. A William Cheney was there in 1824 but I suspect
this was the son of William senior, who then moved into the house
at 52/54 Main Street, vacated after James, his grandfather, died.
But he was only there for a short time as he himself died in 1828.
When records become more frequent, it can be seen that there is
a regular turnover of people. The only recorded business to be
run from the property is that of a shoemaker - Thomas Dunkley
living there for ten or fifteen years.
The last 150 years
Thomas Brawn bought the cottages in 1858 but he
may never have lived there. We know that he moved to Lutton before
1861, where he took over Manor farm previously rented by William
Cheney.
In 1870 the property is described as 2 dwellings,
and Robert Austin starts its 120 year period as a wheelwright's
and carpenter's shop. Sometime before 1910 John Orton moved in
and from before 1927 the Faulkners lived and worked there. Tom
Faulkner lived in one half of the cottages until a couple of years
before he died.
Jeffery Heighton rented Faulkeners Cottage for
a few years, from 1783. He was one of two or three blacksmiths
in the village. The place he moved to and eventually inherited
was where William Austin (the Blacksmith) lived in 1851 (see page
59 map on the right of Main Street, half way up). The house/cottage
was replaced in the early 1900's. It was immediately opposite
the White Hart Pub. The only pictures that remain are what looks
like the smithy shown on the right of the picture on page 5 and
you can see the end of the cottage as picture 9 on page 2 -"Houses
no longer with us". The house that stands there now is picture
20 on page 25. Jeffery Heighton was in that cottage from 1786
to 1827, but was gone by 1831. In 1841 (at over 85 years of age)
he was further up Main Street on the right hand side still approx
where R Fletcher was in the 1851 map on page 59.
There is conflicting evidence as to when he actually
owned the place. The Land Tax returns show him as owner in 1822
but not in the previous list of 1816. For years the owner is said
to be "Oakley's estate". In the Manor Court Rolls it says that
John Heighton, Ironmonger, of 19 Free School Street, Horsley Down,
London acquired the property in 1817 and passed it to his heir,
Jeffery in 1825. John was Jeffery's eldest son, who died in 1825.
The Manor Court Rolls for the period 1808 to 1834 have several
entries on these transactions. They state that Jeffery is his
son John's heir but also that Jeffery paid John £100 for the property
and soon sold it to William Austin for £150. They may have been
related but they were also business men !
By 1831 the land tax returns show the property
is both owned and occupied by William Austin, newly arrived in
the village from Deenethorpe. William Austin was Jeffery's son
in law who married his daughter, Hannah in about 1827, and so
he probably took over from Jeffery in 1827 or soon afterwards.
William died in 1875 and so the property had already stayed "in
the family" for 100 years. William's son William was also a blacksmith
and took over the property from 1876 to 1883, when he seems to
have left the village. It is possible that the property came to
his brother Robert who owned the copyright and occupied number
55/57 Main Street. Robert married Fanny Yeomans in 1865 and although
there then follows a gap in our knowledge, it is probably not
a coincidence that by 1910, ownership had passed to the Yeomans,
who were butchers. So how did it come about that Jeffery Heighton
"just happened" in 1786, to move into the house he was going to
inherit 40 years later ??
One Samuel Oakley bought the property from John
Coles - blacksmith of Titchmarsh (south -west of GG)- in 1786.
It turns out that Oakley was a school master in Lowick (west of
Tichmarsh) and he left the property to his nephew- also Samuel
Oakley, and also a schoolmaster - in Deene (NW of Oundle) about
1808. In 1817 it came to John Heighton as the "nephew and heir
of Samuel Oakley, deceased". Jeffery's wife was Elizabeth Bright
and it looks very much as though Samuel Oakley, Junior, married
Elizabeth Bright's sister, and the Heighton/Bright family provided
the means for Jeffery to live and work in Great Gidding for some
50 years. It cannot be a coincidence either that William Austin,
who eventually inherited the property was born in Deenethorpe,
no more than a mile or two from Deene. Neither can it be a coincidence
that in 1881 the apprentice wheelwright working with Robert Austin
was one Thomas Oakley.
Taking the ownership back further in time, John
Coles bought it from William Danford of Oundle who bought it from
Josiah Smith in 1780. Josiah Smith was a butcher and there are
records of some property being passed down from his Father - also
Josiah Smith and a butcher who bought some property from Thomas
Gostelow in 1711. Before about 1730 the records are in Latin and
I am prepared to assume that Thomas Gostelow was left the relevant
property by William in 1688, and William by another Thomas in
1659 and Thomas by James Gostelow in 1630. The satisfying thing
is that the property we have been following was indeed owned by
Thomas Gosteloe on our 1641 map.
I have some reservations about tracing the history
of the occupation and ownership of Crown Cottage because only between
1711 and 1748 is there any mention of a cottage, but by following
both the land ownership and the occupation, the result seems to
agree closely with other information that exists.
OWNERSHIP
On the 1641 map the property boundaries in the
area opposite the Church are less accurate than they are further
up the street. What is now Crown Cottage appears to have been
built in the freehold property of Brian Serles
There is a document in the Public Record Office
in London which includes a transaction between a Mr Serles and
John Henson in 1642. As the Serles family then disappear from
the village, I guess this was a purchase by John Henson, perhaps
the same John Henson whose initials and the date 1629, were inscribed
above the door of the cottage which stood on the site of Manor
Site Farm until the 1920s.
The Hensons also acquired some land in 1696 from
the Cooper family who, in 1641 owned the property below Serles.
By 1851 the property on Main Street, (which later included the
Alms houses and Manor Farmhouse), was owned by the Lord of the
Manor, There is a document of 1659 which may explain what happened,
but 7.5 acres of Cooper land — probably in the open fields
— remained to be sold to the Hensons.
The Hensons were very certainly a major family
in the area, for over 300 years up to the middle of the 19th century.
It must be assumed the property stayed in the family until it
was left in 1713 by another John Henson a yeoman (ie a farmer),
whose Will has survived which shows he leaves a cottage which,
if his infant daughter dies before she is 18, passes to his eldest
son — also John. This seems to have happened, for the son
dies in 1748 and in his Will he leaves the cottage to his wife,
Ann.
When she dies in 1770 the property, which retains
some of the Cooper land, is divided between their two married
daughters Ann Ladds and Elizabeth Chambers, with the elder daughter,
Elizabeth, inheriting the major portion including the cottage.
From 1781 rent and land tax records exist and in
that year one finds that widow Ladds (I cannot find when Ann's
husband, William Ladds, died) is paying tax for "Chamber's cottage",
a nice re-assurance that I am on the right track. Thereafter it
is plain sailing.
In 1804 Elizabeth Chambers died and left her portion
back into the Ladds family — to her nephew John Henson Ladds.
Ann survives for another 20 years and in 1824 leaves her smaller
share to her son William, — brother to John Henson Ladds.
In 1827 both brothers decide to sell to Edward
Maltby, (who later became Bishop of Durham), for a total of £240.
The bishop sold it in 1841 for £350 to William Simpson, who six
years later sold it to John Simpson for £495 — a doubling
of value in under 20 years. The tithe map of 1851 confirms that
the Crown Inn and the close behind it were then owned by John
Simpson, so this chain of ownership I have followed seems to be
more or less correct.
In 1861 it was sold to Edward Yeomans, and by 1898
it was owned by Jenkins & Jones, the owners of the Falcon Brewery
in Huntingdon. It ceased to be an Inn in 1928. It returned to
private ownership and since 19xx has been the home of David Shepherd,
who has done much to retain the connection between the property
and the consumption of fine ales.
OCCUPATION
In the early years it is difficult to tell whether
a member of the owners family lived in the cottage, or whether
they rented it out. In 1711, John Henson's Will tells us it was
occupied by one John Coles. He may have stayed as the tenant,
with his wife Lydia, for some time, for they were still in the
village up to their deaths in 1736 and 1737.
By 1757 I believe that the occupiers were John
and Elizabeth Weston, Certainly John paid land tax on it in 1767
and by 1780, widow Weston was still there, John having died in
1774. In 1781 and 1782 widow Ladds lived there briefly, although
it is possible she had been living there for a while, with the
Westons.
In the History, I surmised that the first Innkeeper
of the Crown was John Knighton, for from the mid 1780s he was
paid for the supply of ale to the village residents when communal
work was undertaken, such as clearing out Townend Pond. I can
now confirm this was so, for in 1783 he is recorded as taking
over from widow Ladds. It is probable that this is the time that
the old cottage was replaced by the purpose-built Crown Inn. If
the 1641 map is accurate, then the original cottage was slightly
higher up the hill than the position of the Inn.
The first mention of the name so far found in 1800
gives it as "Rose and Crown". In 1813 it was the Crown and again
in 1851, but in 1854 it was again the Rose and Crown. It did not
seem to matter which was used.
John Knighton was still there in 1822 —
a tenure of 40 years, although his wife, Sarah had died in 1804,
but by the time of the 1827 Land Tax returns, the ownership had
changed to the Bishop of Durham and one Thomas Danes had taken
over the occupancy. Danes has no other relationship with the village,
and so it looks as though the Bishop put him in to look after
his assets!
We now reach the time of the Census returns and
see Thomas Danes still there in 1841. Perhaps he left when the
Bishop sold the property. John Crawley was in the Crown by the
census of 1847, and maybe earlier and stayed there until his death
in 1867. It appears that his wife Ann kept it going until her
death ten years later.
By 1881 the Garratts had begun their long reign
as the landlords of Gidding starting with Richard Stevens Garratt
(sometimes known as Richard, but also as Stephen) and his wife
Charlotte. Richard stayed until 1895 and trained three of his
sons to follow him. Frederick was listed as publican at the Crown
in 1891 before taking over at the Fox and Hounds in 1894, assisted
by his younger brother Richard Junior. By 1901 the third son Arthur
Garratt was in charge of the Crown. He was eventually replaced
in about 1910 by Charles Burton who ran it until 1927, when the
Huntingdon Brewery Company (which had absorbed the Falcon Brewery)
transferred its interest to the Fox and Hounds, apparently taking
the landlord with them, although he continued living at the Crown
until 1931.
Top |